For over 200 years, medical professionals have used body mass index (BMI) as a tool to determine the overall health status of an individual. Using a simple equation of weight to height, people can be classified as underweight, healthy weight, overweight or obese.
However, research suggests that this single measurement may not be the best indicator of health on its own. How do we measure what's healthy? That's just one of the questions that health care, academic, media and other experts addressed in an event hosted by The Atlantic and Abbott. As it turns out, there may not be an easy answer.
Tracy Middleton, health director at a women’s magazine, offered one explanation. "I think people have latched onto BMI because they can go online and figure out the calculation themselves."
Some health professionals think this technique is outdated while others appreciate the simplicity.
"BMI is an easy and cost-effective way to figure out someone’s degree of health," added Dr. Rachel Bond, associate director of the Women's Heart Health Program at Lenox Hill Hospital. Professor and registered dietitian Dr. Carla Prado agreed, "We can't ignore how much we've learned from BMI; it works well for measuring levels of obesity.”
As a research tool, BMI helps classify people of varying ages, genders, demographics and locations into basic groups based on fat mass — but beyond that, grouping people based on this single number may have its limits in defining health status.
While many of the healthcare providers in the room pointed out the benefits of BMI, they also understood the limitations.
"Some of the problems with BMI are that health varies so greatly from person to person with the same BMI, and the score doesn't take into account people with different body composition or fat to muscle ratio, like cancer survivors or bodybuilders," said Dr. Prado.
"As athletes, we always have a higher BMI because our muscle weight tips the scales," explained Sharon Monplaisir, a three-time Olympic fencer for the United States.
These nuances underline the importance of finding alternative ways to assess where people fall on the health spectrum.
The conversation turned to the important ways in which muscle factors into health, such as mobility and balance, strength, immunity and wound healing.
"We tend to focus on these arbitrary numbers, instead of behaviors," said Mary Jane Detroyer, a registered dietitian and personal trainer. "For example, if you don't have muscle mass, you can't get out of a chair," she explained.
Suzette Pereira, Ph.D., a researcher at Abbott added, "Once you turn 40, you can lose up to eight percent of your muscle each year. Maintaining muscle is really important for movement and for metabolism."
The experts agreed that muscle can be a good indicator of health status since it correlates with quality of life. But, how can a physician measure indicators of muscle health in a simple way?
There are several ways to measure a person’s muscle mass, including MRIs, DEXA scans and portable ultrasounds. Yet something as simple as looking at someone's walking speed also known as gait speed may be able to give physicians some insight.
"Gait speed, or how fast you can walk for a fixed time, is a strong indicator of people's health," Pereira explained. Research suggests that gait speed can help predict negative health outcomes and has even been associated with life expectancy in older adults. Performing a test to measure walking speed over a short distance could be an effective way to establish health status. Another indicator of muscle health is gauging a person’s ability to rise from a chair without using their hands for assistance.
Heather Milton, senior exercise physiologist at the Sports Performance Center at NYU Langone Health, suggests asking patients if they move regularly or are physically active to get an idea of how they're feeling. "Those are simple questions that can be asked by a physician, regardless of BMI," she added.
The group stressed the need for a comprehensive perspective on health.
"When working with patients, I look at them as a whole, including family history, genetics and other variables," said Dr. Bond. Dr. Donna-Marie Manasseh, Director and Chief of Breast Surgery at Maimonides Breast Cancer Center agreed. "In the end, assessing health status requires a scorecard that includes a range of things that are easy to measure."
The Bottom Line
How do we define health? While there is no perfect measurement, multiple tools can work together to provide doctors and individuals with the most comprehensive information.
Pereira added an important takeaway: " We must continue to challenge the status quo and look at health from every possible angle, including addressing the importance of muscle health."
Did you find this content helpful?YES NO
Eliminating Pediatric Malnutrition: A Call for Universal Screening
By: Karyn Wulf, MD, MPH, Pediatric Medical Director at Abbott Appropriate growth during childhood lays the foundation for a lifetime of health. While important, growth alone does not always tell the full story of a child’s health. A child may not be getting all the nutrients they need, and occasional growth screenings may not catch nutrient deficiencies until a child is malnourished. The consequences of nutrient deficiencies can include not only poor growth, but also impaired physical or cognitive development. Identifying children at risk is crucial so that dietary or nutritional interventions can be started long before growth or development issues occur.
Improving Childhood Nutrition with a Multidisciplinary Approach
By: Karyn Wulf MD, MPH, Pediatric Medical Director at Abbott. When it comes to assessing childhood nutrition, it can be more complex than simply making sure your kid eats his or her vegetables. Key outcomes of good childhood nutrition aren’t just linear growth or weight gain, but also includes organ and brain development. Nutritional limitation in any of those areas may cause long-term problems with optimal growth and development. That’s why primary care physicians should consider a team approach when treating kids who are falling behind on growth.